Obama Missing the Mark on Keystone Pipeline – A View from an Environmentalist

March 10, 2012
By

Seeing $4.09 a gallon gas on the way home today, I wondered to myself “Dear Mr. President, do you want to get re-elected?”

I am not a Democrat, nor a Republican. I am not an ideologue, nor can I stand listening to the demagogues that pollute our airwaves. And, looking at the current crop of candidates remaining in the Republican primary field, I cannot see myself casting a general election vote for a single one of them.

However, driving home today and seeing gas at $4.09 a gallon, only a day after the Senate rejected fast-tracking the Keystone oil pipeline, makes me think the President has forgotten what it is like to be an ordinary American. (Several Senate members were directly lobbied by the President to vote against the pipeline.)

I am also not blind to the President’s environmental concerns. I worked for over a year in college canvassing five days a week as a grassroots activist fighting to renew and strengthen the Clean Water Act. I also understand the President’s desire to protect the Ogallala Aquifer, probably more strongly than those who depend on it for their very existence.

I understand that solar and wind power have to be our future and as the father of a son with asthma, understand that America’s dependence on the internal combustion engine brings significant risks to our air. I even understand our need for government support and investment in new energy projects, even when they fail as was the case with Solyndra. I understand the potential environmental consequences of drilling as we all saw with the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 or yesterday in the newspaper with the drilling induced earthquakes in Ohio.

However, there has to a short-term plan in place to keep production levels high and prices low. And encouraging domestic production and supporting projects like the Keystone pipeline will also help us avoid entanglements in parts of the world which only seek to make us the target of more hatred.

I drive a vehicle that gets 32 miles per gallon on the highway. But $4 a gallon gas puts a financial pressure on me and my family, and millions of other American families that we do not need. If the President cannot accept the Keystone proposal in its current form, then he needs to be holding daily meeting with Republicans to find a solution that both sides can live with.

It’s good that President Obama is looking out for the long-term, especially after so many years have passed with not enough action. However, there also need to be short-term solutions in place as the nation makes this difficult transition to help American families that are struggling today.

J.D. Krug
Jdkrug1@hotmail.com


Twitt

Tags: , ,

6 Responses to Obama Missing the Mark on Keystone Pipeline – A View from an Environmentalist

  1. Tammy Jennings on March 10, 2012 at 10:18 am

    While I don’t dissagree with you, Mr. Krug, on the need for an interim solution, I do dissagree that the Keystone XL pipeline is that solution.
    The tarsands oil is proposed to be shipped to Texas so it can be put on the world market, not the U.S. market.
    Speculation over the possibility of a war with Iran is what is currently driving up gas prices, not a shortage in production and refining in North America.

    • J.D. Krug on March 10, 2012 at 1:55 pm

      More supply = lower prices. Regardless of where it comes from or where it’s going.

      • caroline rose on March 11, 2012 at 11:59 am

        fear and confusion > window for higher prices and laying the ground work for further exploitation.
        I was born and raised in the Tar Sands area. A land that fed and nurtured the people is now poison. Cancers once rare are rampant. Where is the talk of 3eyed fish, sick birds and moose? You promoters of the pipeline have no feeling for the land or the people. “just a bunch of indians” is a statement i’ve heard. Well, those ‘indians’ have human bodies…canaries for your self focused way of going. That water that has created fish with 2 jaws etc is going North into the main waters. Ramping up production Will increase CO2 levels to the point of no return.
        Harper’s gov’t has been hiding information about environmental effects, while laying out the plans to criminalize protesters with a matching crime bill in masquerade. Human Rights is environmental health.
        People who do not know what it means to say that the earth is alive will not know what I mean when I say – Our Mother has cancer. We can be a part of the healing process, or we can be a carcinogen. We are at a crucial time in our existence as microbes on this glorious planet.
        Manifest Destiny is a lie whose time is up.

  2. D LaBounty on March 10, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    With all due respect, how does a pipeline from Canada to the Gulf provide more & less expensive energy for the US? There are already major pipelines and refineries from Alberta to Illinois and Okalahoma, but they’ve not reduced the price of energy at all. The Keystone XL pipeline WILL allow easier exportation of this cheap, dirty Canadian tar sand oil OUTSIDE North America. If the objective was really to provide less expensive energy for the US with this Canadian oil, why not build refineries on the US/Canadian border instead of building a pipeline to the Gulf?

    Or maybe I’m just missing something here….

    • J.D. Krug on March 10, 2012 at 1:53 pm

      You’re missing the laws of supply and demand. More supply = lower prices.

  3. asdf on June 21, 2012 at 10:46 am

    You may want to read this article about how the Keystone pipeline will raise prices in the Midwest.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-01/keystone-oil-pipeline-seen-raising-gas-prices-in-midwest-energy.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*